上海治理论坛第535期
问题：Love Well, Whip Well: A Competing View of Political Affinity Between Countries for ESG-Violating Firms（爱得深，，，，罚得重：ESG违规企业之间国家政治亲和力的对立看法）
演讲人：夏军教授，，，，德克萨斯大学达拉斯分校Naveen Jindal商学院
主持人：于晓宇教授，，，，威廉希尔治理学院
时间：2024年11月3日（周日），，，，下昼14:00
所在：威廉希尔校本部东区1号楼治理学院420聚会室
主理单位：威廉希尔治理学院、上海企业立异与高质量生长研究中心（上海市软科学研究基地）、中国科学学与科技政策研究会企业立异与工业政策专委会、上海市行为科学学会、“数字立异治理与治理”重点立异团队
演讲人简介：
夏军教授任职于德克萨斯大学达拉斯分校Naveen Jindal商学院，，，，现在担当MOR高级主编，，，，AMR、JIBS等期刊编委。。夏军教授的研究集中于组织理论、公司战略、社会网络、国际商务等领域，，，，已在Strategic Management Journal、Academy of Management Journal、Organization Science等国际高水平期刊揭晓数十篇研究效果。。
演讲内容简介：
The prevailing literature on political affinity and multinational corporations’ (MNCs’) global operation commonly views political affinity as a protective shield, suggesting that the closer the relationship between the two countries, the greater the protection for MNCs. This perspective, however, is usually limited to the context of MNCs operating under normal conditions. This posits that political affinity may act as a double-edged sword in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) misconduct. While political affinity can provide an “insurance-like effect” by mobilizing home-country stakeholders to shield MNCs overseas, it may simultaneously provoke a “domestic-like penalty,” diminishing their inclination to offer protection and amplifying the reputational penalties for the offending firm. We further propose that shared language and bilateral commercial ties reinforce the domestic-like effects, intensifying the negative side of political affinity on the firm’s reputation. On the contrary, an MNC’s past ESG performance helps maintain domestic stakeholders’ confidence in the firm, intensifying the positive side of political affinity on reputational penalties. Using a sample of 9,153 ESG-violating incidents by 547 U.S. firms in different countries, our study unveils fresh insights into the double-edged sword role of political affinity.
本研究探讨了政治亲和力怎样影响跨国公司（MNCs）因在东道国违反情形、社会和治理（ESG）标准而在母国遭受的声誉处分。。；；； ；；谄谕シ蠢砺，，，，我们以为，，，，母国与东道国之间的政治亲和力越强，，，，母国利益相关者对公司在外洋肩负社会责任的期望也越高。。因此，，，，当ESG违规爆发在政治上亲密的东道国时，，，，母国利益相关者会体现出更大的失望情绪，，，，从而导致更严重的声誉处分。。我们还识别出三种要害情境因素——违规严重性、居心性和频仍性——它们通过加剧利益相关者的失望水平来放大政治亲和力对声誉处分的影响。。通太过析涉及547家总部设在美国的跨国公司和9,153个ESG事务的数据，，，，我们发明实证效果在很洪流平上支持了这些假设。。
接待宽巨匠生加入！
